Faculty
Faculty members and guest lecturers are international experts in research impact assessment. The organising committee and the faculty team are committed to designing and delivering a high quality programme that best fits the needs of participants.
Cy Frank, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alberta Innovates – Health Solutions (AIHS) Scientific Director, ISRIA 2014 [+]
As of January 2014, he has published 266 peer reviewed articles, 40 book chapters, and 457 meeting abstracts. He was the inaugural Scientific Director of the Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis of Canadian Institutes of Health Research from 2000-2006 and President of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association in 2009, and the Vice President Research Strategy for Alberta Health Services from 2010-2013. |
|
Kathryn Graham, Director, Performance Management and Evaluation, AIHS School Director, ISRIA 2014 [+]
In health care, she participated in the implementation of a number of continuum of care models such as soft-tissue injuries, brain injury and chronic pain. The strategic components included a number of innovative practices such as disability management tools, medical advisory guidelines, case management protocols, as well as a process for setting standards and developing a reporting system for evaluating thousands of different health care providers across a preferred provider network in Alberta. She has an advocate role on the Canadian Evaluation Society Board (Alberta Chapter) and is a regular contributor to both the Canadian and American annual evaluation conferences. She is also a member on a number of organizations that focus on impact including the National Alliance of Provincial Health Research Organizations (NAPHRO), the Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (CASRAI) and the Science of Science Network on Mental Health headed by the Graham Boeckh Foundation and facilitated by RAND Europe. She is a social scientist and her research interests are in systems level monitoring and evaluation, impact assessment, “Science of Science”, mental health and clinical outcomes. She has a Ph.D. in Applied Psychology from the University of Cranfield, England with a specialization in Industrial Psychology and measurement.
|
|
Eddy Nason, Director of Health and Innovation, Institute on Governance (IOG) Programme Director, ISRIA 2014 [+]
|
|
Paula Adam, Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS) [+]
Paula is currently working on the assessment of the impact of the Catalan greatest charity, circa 100 Million Euros in the course of 20 editions. She is also involved in the research characterisation and assessment of the scientific activities performed in the top-quality Health Research Institutes of Spain according to an accredited ranking. She has conducted several studies tracing the outcomes of the research funded by AQuAS (accountability in relation to public investment) that have allowed her to use different methodological approaches ranging from the development and application of questionnaires till qualitative methodologies. She also has expertise in the assessment of healthcare delivery, healthcare priority setting and waiting lists. In the past, Paula has worked at the OECD and The World Bank doing policy analysis and assessment. Paula was born in 1966 in Spain and holds a PhD in Economics from the European University Institute in Florence (Italy).
|
|
Éric Archambault, Science-Metrix [+]
Dr. Archambault is a renowned researcher and practitioner in scientometrics and is a member of the editorial board of the journal Scientometrics, a life-time member of the International Society for Scientometrics and Infometrics (ISSI) and of the Canadian, American and European evaluation societies. Dr. Archambault has published about 20 papers in refereed journals and has presented his research at several national and international conferences. He has a Doctorate in Science and Technology Policy Studies from the University of Sussex, UK. (SPRU). |
|
Martin Buxton, Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University
[+]
Amongst a number of other applied and methodological research interests (including the economic evaluation of screening programmes and of transplantation surgery, and methodological work on making economic evaluation methods appropriate to policy-makers), an important research focus has been a series of studies assessing the impact and return on investment from publically funded medical research. With a colleague in HERG, he developed the Buxton-Hanney payback framework which is now widely used, and has led influential UK projects to estimate the economic returns to public investment in cardio-vascular and most recently cancer research. He has advised many research funding agencies, particularly in the UK and Canada, on methods of impact assessment. |
Claire Donovan, Brunel University [+]
|
Jonathan Grant, Director, Kings Policy Institute, King's College London [+]
Recently Jonathan led a project reviewing the Excellence in Innovation for Australia (EIA) Trial on behalf of the Australian Technology Network of Universities. Modelled, in part, from the impact element of the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF), the EIA Trial aimed to assess the non-academic impact of research generated by a subset of Australian universities and be a pilot for a potential companion piece to the next Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA), a nationwide performance assessment of Australian universities. Jonathan Grant was President of RAND Europe between June 2006 and October 2012. Under his leadership Jonathan oversaw the doubling of RAND Europe’s activity in Europe, the founding of a vibrant and successful office in Brussels, and the establishment of the Cambridge Centre for Health Services Research, a joint venture with the University of Cambridge. Jonathan joined RAND in 2002. He was formerly Head of Policy at The Wellcome Trust. Jonathan received his Ph.D from the Faculty of Medicine, University of London and his B.Sc. (Econ) from the London School of Economics.
|
|
Chris Henshall, Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University [+]
|
|
Deanne Langlois-Klassen, AIHS [+]
|
|
Alexandra Pollitt, RAND Europe [+]
|
|
Maite Solans-Domènech, AQuAS [+]
She has conducted several studies tracing the outcomes of the research funded by AQuAS (accountability in relation to public investment) that have allowed her to use different methodological approaches ranging from the development and application of questionnaires till qualitative methodologies. She also has worked with different projects related to the elaboration of evidence base reports such as health technology assessments, development of indicators to measure the effectiveness of medical practice, prioritisation of interventions, and the development, implementation and evaluation of metric properties of perceived health questionnaires. |
|
Steven Wooding, RAND Europe [+]
Wooding has particular expertise is in developing and applying measurement frameworks and evaluation tools that capture the diverse range of benefits produced by research. This includes work examining research in biomedicine, social science and the arts and humanities. Wooding has worked for government and charity sector clients in the UK, Ireland, Canada, USA and Australia and led a number of international studies on evaluating the long term – 10-25 year – impacts of research. He has methodological interests in visualising concepts and data alongside the quantification of qualitative information. Wooding received his M.A. in natural sciences and his Ph.D. in cell biology from the University of Cambridge. |
Congratulations to the ISRIA Banff 2014 Alumni Travel Award recipients!
My personal learning goal for ISRIA 2013 was to advance my understanding of the methods for assessing impact. Following ISRIA 2013, I undertook three actions to improve impact reporting at CADTH: Developing case study guidelines featuring checklists to guide the types of information required to create robust case studies; streamlining our reporting in line with the checklists to gather less information, but of a better quality, using e-forms; and initiating a community of practice, the goal of which is to improve impact and evaluation practices though collective solutions to common challenges. Using guidance from ISRIA 2013, efficiencies have been gained on the reporting side, as less time is spent gathering and analyzing impact-related information. The case studies – “impact stories” as we call them – have been well-received by our funders and Board of Directors. The community of practice promises to improve the quality of impact reporting while building capacity and promoting better communication of impact.
I started as the Research Impact Manager at Worldwide Cancer Research in June 2013 after working as the maternity cover for our Science Communications Manager. My background is in science, so the field of Research Impact Assessment (RIA) was completely new me; the ISRIA in Barcelona seemed like a perfect learning opportunity.
ISRIA was a very steep learning curve, but it helped me to set up and fine-tune the monitoring and evaluation system that we now have in place. As a result, we are now showing accountability both to our Board of Trustees and our supporters, which we had never done before. Results so far show that our research strategy is successful. I presented at a workshop on RIA for other UK medical research charities, where there was a lot of interest in how Worldwide Cancer Research tracks the impact of a basic science research programme. As well as giving me a great network of contacts, the school provided me with a highly sought after skillset that is helping me carry out my work, and will prove useful for any future career progression.
I came to the Barcelona school only partially aware of some of the formal research impact assessments carried out for major research funders, by organisations like RAND and CAHS. I was prepared to be intimidated! These were surely larger, better-resourced institutions, with long established scientific programmes. Would I be able to find anything practical to take back to my own organisation, among the assembled minds, methods and manuscripts?
I left the school with a clear answer – and my efforts to establish a research impact assessment programme at MSF since then will form the focus of my presentations in Banff.
What impressed me most from the Barcelona school? A common ambition to build a community of shared practice. How to ensure research impact assessment delivers value / why it is important to draw on sound methods / what to focus resources on, to build a worthwhile programme which will – in itself – have a positive impact?
I’m at the earliest stages of asking these questions – and am reassured I’m not the only one! I look forward to meeting you all, sharing experiences, and discussing new approaches as we build on what was initiated in Barcelona (but this time perhaps with more trees, and less tapas).